http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/09/blogs
Anyone subscribe to all 50? ;-)
Recent Comments
- Account Deleted on You gave me a Job - I love you.
- Account Deleted on An interview with VisualCV
- Account Deleted on What Women Want
- Steven Johnson on An interview with VisualCV
- ANother on They've got the power
- Alex Hens on Technically white-noising out that negative Social Media buzz about you
- Alex Hens on Bubbletastic
- Twosteps on Dilbert nails Social Media Marketing for many Corporates
- Chris M on Dilbert nails Social Media Marketing for many Corporates
- John on Location, Location, Location - Facebook Local
« Going Down? | Main | Matt's 15 most read blogs »
10/03/2008
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Matt
I got quite excited when I spotted this in the Guardian (sad I know). I was surprised to find I knew of less than half a dozen of the blogs they listed and disappointed to find I wasn't interested in subscribing to many of the others.
Regards, Louise
Posted by: Louise Triance | 10/03/2008 at 04:27 PM
Shame they did not add the traffic stats with them...that would have made interesting reading...
Posted by: Eddie A | 10/03/2008 at 05:12 PM
Hi Matt
I had a quick look over the list and to be honest I thought the list was quite poor, in fact how did they come up with the list in the first place "the worlds most powerful blogs"
So "A girl with a one track mind" is powerful and influential, I don't think so!
The only true list is the technorati top one hundred, certainly more accurate.
You would think the Guardian could have come up with a better list.
Sorry for the rant
I agree with Louise
Regards
Stephen
Posted by: Stephen Fowler | 11/03/2008 at 04:12 PM
I saw this and it made me shake ... they are trying to take an old media viewpoint and relate it to blogging.
The 'power' view looks back at the old media structures. I feel that focus of the writer and the relevance to the individual reading the blog is the most important factor.
Not what some journalists at the guardian think ...
Posted by: John Whitehurst | 13/03/2008 at 12:36 PM