Lately, I've been mulling over the reports that newspapers intend to charge for their online content.
A futile exercise by Murdoch and the like, long after the dam wall has bust?
or justified compensation for valuable content that in fairness should be paid for?
It's a tricky one for sure. To pay or not to pay.
In terms of recruitment, we blogged about the subscription model on recruitment sites, such as The Ladders a while back and more recently and much deeper into the recession, Matt has got the debate going nicely on his own blog.
I read an article from the Observer recently and it made me think.
It was all about Charles Percy Snows 'infectious idea/meme' that there exists two cultures in society.
Literary Intellectuals v. Natural Scientists - both who had mutual incomprehension and mistrust which had negative repercussions for society.
According to John Naughton, today its about those obsessed with control and those who celebrate openness and creativity.
Here is where it gets interesting - its the early 1990's when the dawn of electronic networking is being recognised. He presents two options from which we could choose from:
1/ 'Government-provided terminals in every home on which appear information and services from a small number of approved providers (the BBC and Guardian for news, the Met Office for weather information, Reuters for stockmarket information, and so on).
Everything is controlled and reliable.
2/A publishing system in which anybody can publish anything - including lies, propaganda and pornography - with no prior approval. '
Question: which system would you have chosen?
Second scenario: -to design the world's first global encyclopedia
1/ A huge project with top minds and thinkers, experienced editors who source the best most authoritative articles - all rigorously checked for impartiality and accuracy.
2/'The alternative proposal is from a guy who says "Well, I think we should put up a website and ask people to write stuff for it."
Which one would you have chosen?'
Now lets think of a recruitment scenario. You are looking for a job and you are given two future options:
1/An online recruitment service that provides jobs in your specific industry, houses your CV and matches your skills and personality to an organisations' cultural fit -
You Pay for this tailored service.
2/An online recruitment service that provides jobs in your specific industry, houses your CV and matches your skills and personality to an organisations' cultural fit -
You do not pay for this tailored service.
Which one would you have chosen?
Recent Comments